Video: Second Amendment Works – He Thought He Was Going To Walk Out With Free Stuff, She And Her Firearm Had Another Idea

Google “Shoplifting in San Francisco” and you will find more than 100,000 hits. And you will find lots of YouTube videos, where you can watch a single thief, or an entire gang, walk into an SF Walgreens or CVS and empty the shelves. Most walk in, go about their pilfering, and then walk out, though at least one thief rode their bike into the store and departed the same way, carefully navigating their two-wheeler down a narrow aisle.

We probably shouldn’t call it shoplifting anymore, since that term connotes the idea of a person trying to conceal their crime. In San Francisco, there is no attempt to conceal theft, and there is almost never any effort by store employees, including security personnel, to confront the thieves. The most they do is record the thefts with their cell phones.

Why is shoplifting so rampant? Because state law holds that stealing merchandise worth $950 or less is just a misdemeanor, which means that law enforcement probably won’t bother to investigate, and if they do, prosecutors will let it go.

Why won’t store employees do anything about this theft? Because they don’t want to take the risk. I doubt many would, knowing that a Rite Aid employee was murdered recently after trying to stop two thieves. Moreover, a confrontation within the store risks harming not only store staff but also customers, so employees are almost certainly instructed by their managers to do nothing. 

However, a video that was sent to us today comes from California and shows that the second amendment still works in this liberal state!

In the video a group of girls tries to stop a shoplifter from walking out of the store with his stolen merchandise, he probably would have gotten away but the store owner shows why the second amendment is so important! Watch the video here

7 thoughts on “Video: Second Amendment Works – He Thought He Was Going To Walk Out With Free Stuff, She And Her Firearm Had Another Idea”

  1. The Second Amendment didn’t work – Firearms worked despite the Second Amendment!

    America was sold down the river when the 18th-century founding fathers replaced Biblical responsibilities (based upon the moral law of God) for Enlightenment rights, and nothing demonstrates it better than the Second Amendment.

    Think about it: The Amendment WITH the wording “shall not be infringed” is the MOST infringed, licensed, and limited Amendment of the entire twenty seven. Furthermore, a future generation of our posterity is likely to see the Second Amendment whittled away entirely or repealed altogether. This is inherent nature and danger of optional Enlightenment rights versus non-optional Biblical responsibilities, such as the following:

    “Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two-edged sword [or today’s equivalent] in their hand … this honor have all his saints. Praise ye Yah.” (Psalm 149:6-9)

    “But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house [beginning with spiritual and physical protection], he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” (1 Timothy 5:8)

    Which is more potent: 1) An optional right, or 2) A non-optional responsibility?

    Which is more likely to be infringed, licensed, and ultimately abolished altogether?

    Which did the pre-Second Amendment Americans look to for their authority to bear arms, with little or nor infringement?

    For more, listen to “The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight,” delivered at the Springfield, Missouri Firearms and Freedom Symposium, at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Go to our Video page and scroll down to title.

    See also online Chapter 12 “Amendment 2: Constitutional vs. Biblical Self-Defense” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective.” Click on the top entry on our Online Books page and scroll down to Chapter 12.

    1. You are absolutely correct. The Armed Citizen can put a stop to this insanity. That’s why I carry everywhere I go.

  2. This is why I carry everywhere I go where it’s legal to carry. If I saw some a-hole walking out with merchandise, I would confront them and show them that they aren’t walking out with it. In Texas, we can legally protect persons and property

  3. it is time for store owners to get armed an put a stop to this bunch of low lifr bastards ifone ever comes in my store and trys takeing any he will need a under taker


    ATTENTION ALL CURRENTLY EMPLOYED AND RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS (INCLUDING ALL MILITARY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS): It is long past time we join the ranks of those Americans willing to stand up to all of those across this nation who would victimize any of us. For your information the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) (A federal law passed in 2004) provides we may carry a firearm regardless of any state law with only a few exceptions (i.e. school zones designated as “No Firearms” areas and where privately owned property/facilities have been designated as “No Firearms” areas by their owners). Yes, many of us have and may face resistance from left leaning authorities, but case law to date has reinforced the 2004 law. If I have to choose protecting my family and neighbors from attacks from criminal elements versus authorities bent on stopping/disarming me I will engage both groups with equal vigor! Soldier/Cop/Mercenary, Retired

  5. Lying Corrupt Quid Pro KING Joe could care less about persons life. All these laws the liberal commie Democrats are proposing for gun control only affects law abiding gun owners, it doesn’t affect criminals, they don’t play by the rules. In order for corrupt Quid Pro to transform America to Hussein Obama’s Marxist America, Corrupt Quid Pro has to confiscate all the guns first.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.